Cloudflare Docs
Magic WAN
Cloudflare Docs
Magic WAN
Search icon (depiction of a magnifying glass)
GitHub icon
Visit Magic WAN on GitHub
Set theme to dark (⇧+D)
  1. Products
  2. Magic WAN
  3. Reference
  4. Traffic steering

Traffic steering

Magic WAN uses a static configuration to route traffic through Anycast tunnels from Cloudflare’s global network to your network, and from your network to Cloudflare’s global network.

Magic WAN steers traffic along tunnel routes based on priorities you define in the Cloudflare dashboard or via API.

The example in this diagram has three tunnel routes. Tunnels 1 and 2 have top priority and Tunnel 3 is secondary.


When there are multiple routes with equal priority and different next-hops, Cloudflare uses equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing. An example of multiple routes with equal priority would be Tunnel 1 and Tunnel 2.

The use of ECMP routing provides load balancing across tunnels with the same priority.

​​ Equal-cost multi-path routing

Equal-cost multi-path routing uses hashes calculated from packet data to determine routes. The hash always uses the source and destination IP addresses. For TCP and UDP packets, the hash includes the source and destination ports as well. The ECMP algorithm divides the hash for each packet by the number of equal-cost next hops. The modulus (remainder) determines the route the packet takes.

Using ECMP has a number of consequences:

  • Routing to equal-cost paths is probabilistic.

  • Packets in the same session (or flow) with the same source and destination have the same hash. The packets also use the same next hop.

  • Routing changes in the number of equal-cost next hops can cause traffic to use different tunnels. For example, dynamic prioritization triggered by health check events can cause traffic to use different tunnels.

​​ Examples

This diagram illustrates how ECMP distributes traffic equally across two paths with the same priority.

​​ Normal traffic flow


When Magic WAN health checks determine that Tunnel 2 is unhealthy, that route is dynamically de-prioritized, leaving Tunnel 1 the sole top-priority route. As a result, traffic is steered away from Tunnel 2, and all traffic flows to Tunnel 1:

​​ Failover traffic flow: Scenario 1

Customer router failure


When Magic WAN determines that Tunnel 1 is unhealthy as well, that route is also de-prioritized, leaving Tunnel 3 as the top priority route. In that case, all traffic flows to Tunnel 3.

​​ Failover traffic flow: Scenario 2

Intermediary ISP failure


When Magic WAN determines that Tunnels 1 and 2 are healthy again, it re-prioritizes those routes, and traffic flow returns to normal.

​​ ECMP and bandwidth utilization

Because ECMP is probabilistic, the algorithm routes roughly the same number of flows through each tunnel. However it does not consider the amount of traffic already sent through a tunnel when deciding where to route the next packet.

For example, consider a scenario with many very low-bandwidth TCP connections and one very high-bandwidth TCP connection. Packets for the high-bandwidth connection have the same hash and thus use the same tunnel. As a result, the high-bandwidth connection tunnel utilizes greater bandwidth than the others.